Skip to main content

Find us on

facebook youtube flickr

Upcoming Events

faculty guide

My Computer Ate My Data, Changed My Students' Grades and Stole My Money
OR
What all faculty need to know about securing their information
Friday May 18, 2012 at 12:30-2pm
DCAL Conference Room, 102 Baker Library

Santosh Kumar

Mobile Measurement of Behavioral and Social Health at Population Scale
Santosh Kumar
University of Memphis
Wednesday May 23 at 4:15pm
Steele 006
 

Past Programs

mcgraw youtube

Cyber War, Cyber Peace, Stones, and Glass Houses
Gary McGraw
Cigital, Inc.
April 26, 2012 

bigham video

Real-Time Crowd Support for People with Disabilities
Jeff Bigham
University of Rochester
November 15, 2011 

cyberops vid

Cyber Operations and National Security
A Panel Discussion
October 20, 2011

summer camp vid

CISO vs. Adversary
Healthcare Security Investment Game
July 7, 2011 

 


Institute for Security, Technology, and Society
Dartmouth College
6211 Sudikoff Laboratory
Hanover, NH 03755 USA
info.ists@dartmouth.edu

Data Mining for Detection of Network Intrusions

Project Summary

Data Mining for Intrusion Detection

  1. Stepping Stones: We have focused on the application of data-mining techniques to a particular problem: detecting "stepping stones,'' that is, a situation where someone is telnetting through a sequence of machines. The theory is that while some of these occurrences are innocent, hackers quite frequently use a series of steppingstones to get to their target, in order to minimize the chance that the intrusion can be traced to their home machine.
  2. Masqueraders: Using the recently published Bell-Labs benchmark data, where real users' logs of UNIX commands were modified by using real logs from another user in a small number of places, Mr. Yung investigated the problem of detecting "masqueraders," where one user gets control of the account of another. Yung developed a technique that beats all of the proposed techniques that have been developed for the problem represented by this data. In particular, he gets significantly smaller false-positive rates for a fixed false-negative rate. The big idea is constant revision of what "normal" behavior for a user means, as more data is gathered, and the user's behavior evolves slowly.
  • Project Lead: Jeffrey Ullman (Stanford)